News & Resources

Why Swab Counting Errors Cost More Than You Think, And How to Fix It

July 14, 2025

3 mins

Why Swab Counting Errors Cost More Than You Think, And How to Fix It

Introduction Swab counting isn’t considered among the most exciting topic in healthcare. But it’s one of those behind-the-scenes processes that…

Read Blog
Creating Safer Workflows: The Human-Centric Approach to Swab Counting

June 21, 2025

4 mins

Creating Safer Workflows: The Human-Centric Approach to Swab Counting

In the fast-paced, high-pressure environment of an operating theatre or maternity ward, patient safety is always the top priority. Yet,…

Read Blog
How Retained Swabs Affect Clinicians: A Hidden Burden in Healthcare

June 12, 2025

4 mins

How Retained Swabs Affect Clinicians: A Hidden Burden in Healthcare

Retained swabs affect clinicians in profound and often overlooked ways. While the patient impact is well-known, the hidden emotional and…

Read Blog
1 2 3

Explore the Research Behind iCount.

iCount is backed by robust research and ongoing research. Explore our literature references, whitepapers, publications, case studies, and testimonials to learn more.

A man in a white lab coat examines a sample through a microscope in a laboratory setting.

iCount Resources

The Causes & Hidden Cost of Never Events

These references explore the consequences, policy implications, risk factors, and financial/legal burdens associated with retained surgical items (RSIs).

HSIB, CQC, NHS Improvement, Joint Commission, NHS NPSA, Australia & NZ reports
NHS Long Term Plan & US Navy Navmed Policy

Gawande et al., Birolini et al., Zhan & Miller – major prevalence and outcome studies

Gawande, Steelman, AHRQ – reports showing high costs and added hospital stays

Bailey, Kaiser, Gualniera – legal and malpractice case reviews

Dozens of country-specific studies: US, UK, India, France, Kenya, Brazil, etc.

Wan et al., Sirihorachai et al., Tabibzadeh et al., Anderson – systematic reviews and safety studies

Edel, Greenberg, Christian – documenting risks in manual count procedures

Joint Commission & cost analyses comparing RFID/barcoded swabs with iCount (£9/patient)

Regenbogen et al. – cost model showing economic value of iCount-like tech

Mathew & Imoto – showing limits of imaging to detect RSIs

The iCount Evidence Base

These references support interventions, technology innovations, and human-factors-based solutions to prevent RSIs underpinning the rationale for adopting tools like iCount.

Key Value Proposition

 

iCount is a simple, human-factors-engineered system that acts as a physical checklist to support accurate swab counts to reduce reliance on memory in high-pressure clinical settings .

Our technology is:

  • Clinician centred and easy to adopt
  • Designed for global health systems, adaptable to your protocols.

iCount supports safer surgeries, for every team, in every theatre, maternity and procedural setting.

It was designed to support surgical teams ensuring swabs are counted accurately and efficiently. With an intuitive docking mechanism with optional computer vision, AI enabled verification, iCount helps reduce manual errors in swab tracking, supporting efficiency in high-pressure environments without disrupting workflow

Surgical team and sterile swabs used for swab counting in operating and maternity theatres.