Aug 12, 2025
3 mins
Second victims in the operating theatre are often overlooked in patient safety discussions. When retained surgical swabs occur, the impact is not only on the patient but also on the surgical team’s psychological safety.
A new 2025 study has quantified just how deep that ripple of harm runs inside the operating-theatre team, and the numbers should make every peri-operative leader pause.
Researchers from Hamad Medical Corporation and four international universities surveyed 100 frontline clinicians who had been involved in an adverse-event investigation during the pandemic years. Using the validated Second-Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST), they mapped the emotional and professional fallout that followed each incident. Lippincott Journals
| Impact area | Percentage of respondents |
| Self-doubt / feeling inadequate | 46 % |
| Desire to leave direct patient care | 39 % |
| Considering quitting healthcare altogether | 34 % |
| Felt their well-being was not prioritised by the organisation | 31 % |
| Positive perception of institutional support | 55 % |
In other words, one in three clinicians thinks seriously about walking away after a serious error, and nearly half question their basic competence. Lippincott Journals
Retained surgical items (RSIs), especially sponges and swab, are among the most preventable “never events.” Yet when they do occur, they often involve multiple staff members:
That shared responsibility is exactly why RSIs are cultural detonators. A single mis-count can:
Left unchecked, the human cost compounds the clinical and financial costs we highlight each week in our Hidden Toll series.
The 2025 study doesn’t just diagnose the problem, it points to solutions:
We built iCount because the safest culture starts with the safest process. Our tactile counting dock:
By eliminating the most common root cause of RSIs, we also eliminate one of the most corrosive blows to team culture.
The new data are a stark reminder: retained swabs create second victims as surely as they create first victims. Preventing the error is the surest way to protect both.
If you’d like to see how a simple human-factors tool can reinforce safety and morale, let’s talk.